Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 21(8): 1069-1070, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1213858
2.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 21(9): e290-e295, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1164688

ABSTRACT

WHO recommends a minimum of 80% sensitivity and 97% specificity for antigen-detection rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDTs), which can be used for patients with symptoms consistent with COVID-19. However, after the acute phase when viral load decreases, use of Ag-RDTs might lead to high rates of false negatives, suggesting that the tests should be replaced by a combination of molecular and serological tests. When the likelihood of having COVID-19 is low, such as for asymptomatic individuals in low prevalence settings, for travel, return to schools, workplaces, and mass gatherings, Ag-RDTs with high negative predictive values can be used with confidence to rule out infection. For those who test positive in low prevalence settings, the high false positive rate means that mitigation strategies, such as molecular testing to confirm positive results, are needed. Ag-RDTs, when used appropriately, are promising tools for scaling up testing and ensuring that patient management and public health measures can be implemented without delay.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing/methods , COVID-19 Testing/standards , COVID-19/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2 , False Negative Reactions , False Positive Reactions , Humans , Predictive Value of Tests , Sensitivity and Specificity
3.
4.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 20(10): e268-e273, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-671309

ABSTRACT

Outbreaks of infectious diseases are occurring with increasing frequency and unpredictability. The rapid development and deployment of diagnostics that can accurately and quickly identify pathogens as part of epidemic preparedness is needed now for the COVID-19 pandemic. WHO has developed a global research and innovation forum to facilitate, accelerate, and deepen research collaboration among countries and funders. Great progress has been made in the past decade, but access to specimens remains a major barrier for the development and evaluation of needed quality diagnostics. We present a sustainable model for a global network of country-owned biobanks with standardised methods for collection, characterisation, and archiving of specimens and pathogens to facilitate and accelerate diagnostics development and evaluation for COVID-19 and other diseases of epidemic potential. The biobanking network should be run on the guiding principles of transparency, equitable access, ethics, and respect for national laws that support country ownership and sustainability. Adapting the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits, sharing of specimens from national biobanks can be rewarded through mechanisms such as equitable access to diagnostics at negotiated prices. Such networks should be prepared for any pathogen of epidemic potential.


Subject(s)
Biological Specimen Banks/organization & administration , Biological Specimen Banks/standards , Communicable Diseases/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 , Communicable Disease Control , Communicable Diseases/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Diagnostic Tests, Routine , Epidemics/prevention & control , Humans , International Cooperation , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Specimen Handling/standards , Sustainable Development
5.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 20(9): e245-e249, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-654310

ABSTRACT

The collapse of global cooperation and a failure of international solidarity have led to many low-income and middle-income countries being denied access to molecular diagnostics in the COVID-19 pandemic response. Yet the scarcity of knowledge on the dynamics of the immune response to infection has led to hesitation on recommending the use of rapid immunodiagnostic tests, even though rapid serology tests are commercially available and scalable. On the basis of our knowledge and understanding of viral infectivity and host response, we urge countries without the capacity to do molecular testing at scale to research the use of serology tests to triage symptomatic patients in community settings, to test contacts of confirmed cases, and in situational analysis and surveillance. The WHO R&D Blue Print expert group identified eight priorities for research and development, of which the highest is to mobilise research on rapid point-of-care diagnostics for use at the community level. This research should inform control programmes of the required performance and utility of rapid serology tests, which, when applied specifically for appropriate public health measures to then be put in place, can make a huge difference.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/metabolism , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , Clinical Laboratory Techniques , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Betacoronavirus/genetics , Betacoronavirus/immunology , COVID-19 , COVID-19 Testing , Contact Tracing/methods , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin G/metabolism , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Immunoglobulin M/metabolism , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/immunology , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , RNA, Viral/analysis , SARS-CoV-2 , Time Factors , Triage/methods , Virus Shedding
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL